Case Studies Revamp

Problem

Company projects were spread across the website in a messy way, making them challenging to find. Once someone found a project, the information often looked different from one project to the next, and it was often incomplete.

‘I grasp Hitachi Energy’s long history, but it is difficult to find projects similar to mine which they have worked on in the past or are currently working on’

A smiling woman with short dark hair

Client

Needs to actively search for projects across product pages, news, and reports

‘It is hard to display our experience and know-how if we rely on constantly updating internal slides and regularly asking Business Units about information on their latest projects’

A woman with long dark hair

Sales Manager

Repeatedly requests updated project information when presenting to prospects

Outlook · Inbox“project references”
SM
Sales Manager, NordicsAny recent HVDC references?Tender is on Friday and my slides are from last year…
KA
Key Account, UtilitiesFW: Similar project to this one?Client asked if we did this before. Who would know?
BU
BU MarketingRE: RE: Project list for the deckAttached Projects_v7_FINAL2.pptx, not sure it is complete
SM
Sales Manager, NordicsIs the Brazil substation page still live?Can’t find it from the product page anymore
Jira · Web requestsOpen
WEB-1182WaitingWhere are our substation projects in Brazil?
WEB-1190To doAdd new project to the references page
WEB-1203To doProject page has no results or customer quote
WEB-1207In progressUpdate project list on product page
WEB-1211To doSame as WEB-1182, other region
Before · every project story started as a request (recreated mockup)

Proposal & Process

The proposal was to standardize projects by structuring them as Case Studies and cataloging them through a centralized tool. That tool would let users sort and filter by predefined categories with less effort.

Research activities stayed internal and practical:

  • User interviews with colleagues (sales, marketing, and other intranet users) about how they looked for project stories before opening tickets or asking around, what they searched for, and what they grepped for when something was missing.
  • Surveys and questionnaires on the intranet and website, especially intranet questions on whether search was useful and whether people found what they needed in specific document areas.
  • High-level usability testing of the selector and template by showing designs and walking through the signs of the experience.
  • Google Analytics and Crazy Egg heatmaps after release to see whether people could actually find and use Case Studies, plus A/B testing of selector placement where it mattered.
Teams · Interview notesSales, Nordics
Last time you needed a project story, what did you do?
Searched the site“Product pages, news, reports. I gave up and asked someone.”
Asked around“I message the BU marketing person I know on Teams.”
Opened a ticket“The web team only knows where the page is, not what’s in it.”
Reused old slides“I know they’re out of date, but they’re what I have.”
Intranet · Page feedbackDocuments › References
Did you find what you were looking for?
YesNo
How useful was search in this area?
12345
What were you looking for?
A reference project like ours, same market and voltage
Research · how people hunted for project stories (recreated mockup)

It was necessary to go through the following steps:

  1. Collect throughout the website all existing pages that meet the Case Study criteria

  2. Clean up and sort through the collection

  3. Brainstorm, define, and agree on a tagging and categories system

    One that would work across all Business Units

  4. Tag each Case Study individually to match that tagging system

  5. Analyze existing Case Studies to find patterns in the information that should be displayed

  6. Go through the template creation process with stakeholders

  7. Migrate existing pages into Case Studies

  8. Design, develop, and test the filter and sorting component

  9. Release the new component and include it on multiple product pages

Steps 1 and 2 lived in one long sheet: every candidate page, where it was found, and what to do with it.

Sheet · Page inventory
PageFound inBusiness UnitStatusNotesProduct pagesNewsReportsKeepMergeDrop
Inventory · every page that could count as a case study, row by row (recreated mockup)

The tagging system came out of workshops with the Business Units, one sticky per tag.

Board · Tag workshop
120+ tags, 5 categoriesOfferingMarketsCountrySpecific ProductsVoltageParkedSame tag, differentname per Business Unit?Must work for everyBusiness Unit
Tags · one vocabulary that every Business Unit could accept (recreated mockup)

Steps 3, 4, 5, and 6 were connected, so we had to re-run them across several iterations.

Jira · CS RevampBacklogEpic: Case Study Selector
CS-1Collect every page that meets the Case Study criteriaDone
CS-2Clean up and sort the collectionDone
↻ Tags & template loop · re-run each iteration
CS-3Agree tag categories across Business UnitsReopened
CS-4Tag each Case Study against the vocabularyReopened
CS-5Find patterns in what existing stories showIn progress
CS-6Template review with stakeholdersReopened
Blocked by the loop
CS-7Migrate existing pages into Case StudiesTo do
CS-8Design, build and test the filter componentTo do
CS-9Release and place on product pagesTo do
Jira · four steps that kept coming back (recreated mockup)

Result

The initiative delivered 4 things:

The most impactful was the Case Study Selector, a component that shows descriptions and links to all Case Studies. Users can filter across 7 possible categories. In the backend, the component can be set up so each page shows the most relevant filters. A second iteration also let us showcase a limited set of Case Studies based on criteria set in the backend.

hitachienergy.comTransformers › Case studies
Offering Market: Utilities Country Product + 2 more
Voltage LowMediumHighExtra-highUltra-high
Showing Case Studies for Utilities · High to Extra-high voltageNewest first ▾
Grid connection for an offshore wind farmUtilitiesNorwayHVRead case study →
Transformer fleet refresh for a regional utilityUtilitiesBrazilEHVRead case study →
Substation upgrade without an outageUtilitiesGermanyHVRead case study →
Selector · filters set per page, voltage as a grouped slider (recreated mockup)

A new Case Study Template, plus writing guidelines for using it. Existing project references had to be rewritten to fit the Case Study Template. Editors followed Case Study guidelines that explained each section, showed example text, and shared best practices.

A centralized backend system. All Case Studies now live in a simpler folder structure in the Content Management System. That makes updates easier, because editors can filter and browse all Case Study pages in the backend without walking through the full website folder tree.

A tagging system. A uniform set of 120+ tags from 5 categories (Offering, Markets, Country, Specific Products, Voltage) that works across the complex products and services of all Business Units.

Impact

Before
Monthly views on the original, scattered project pages, each written in its own shape.
After
Monthly views once the same stories ran on one template through the Case Study Selector. Many pages went from nearly zero to a thousand.

Monthly views per project story, before and after the catalog.

The new Case Study Selector made it clearer how important it was to show the company's projects to customers. That helped start a culture shift inside product marketing teams, so that new Case Studies are published every week and older Case Studies got better content quality.

Monthly visits to Case Study pages, compared with their original pages, doubled or tripled. Traffic moved from a low average of about 400 monthly views up to 1,500, and in many cases grew from 0 to 1,000 monthly visits.

The Sales team benefited from getting updated information about the company's projects using the website as an initial source of truth. Sharing with customers also became more transparent, because most of that information is now public.

Products, News, and Events pages can now connect easily to related Case Studies by placing a Case Study Selector limited to that page's topic in one section. That supports better storytelling and adds useful context to the page content.

Challenges

This initiative faced many difficulties, among them:

  • Aligning Case Study tags into a system that worked across Business Units and would stay useful for at least a couple of years took 60% of the project's timeline. Leading many workshops with 30+ stakeholders, dozens of cleanup sessions, and endless emails was hard and often frustrating. Through mediation and by helping Business Units collaborate, we reached a stable set of tags.
  • Categories with number values could not use fixed predefined tags. Those numbers could range from 0.005 to 125,000,000 in the matching energy-related units, because products and services in a project could sit at any stage of the energy grid. We had to design a one-of-a-kind slider filter that grouped those values in a logical way.
  • Finding content that could later become Case Studies was hard, because this was a new writing structure that marketing teams had not defined yet. The source material came from news, events, references, and parts of product pages. Rewriting that material to fit the new structure sometimes needed extra research to fill in missing information.
Outlook · ThreadTo: BU Marketing (all)
RE: RE: RE: RE: Tag list v9, Markets & Offering
···Older messages in this thread
GA
BU Marketing, Grid AutomationTueWe need “Power utilities” and “Utilities” as separate tags. Our customers use both.
TR
BU Marketing, TransformersTueFor us “Data centers” is a Market, not an Offering. Can we move it before we tag?
RG
RicardoWedProposal for v10, to confirm in Thursday’s workshop:Power utilities → UtilitiesData centers: Offering → Markets
Teams · MeetingRecurring
Thu14
Tag alignment workshop: Markets & Offering
14:00–15:30 · Microsoft Teams
RGGATRHVSM30+ invited, all Business Units
1. Merge duplicate tags2. Markets or Offering? Settle the edge cases3. Freeze v10 so tagging can start
JoinChatTag list v10.xlsx
Alignment · where 60% of the timeline went (recreated mockup)

Role

This initiative required me to wear two hats:

Project Manager

  • Coordinated creation of the tagging system (easier said than done; see Challenges)
  • Managed release communications to editors and content owners
  • Released the new component and included it on multiple product pages

User Experience Consultant

  • Ran internal user interviews about how people looked for project stories before opening tickets or asking around, what they searched for, and what they grepped for when something was missing
  • Used intranet and website surveys and questionnaires to check search usefulness and document-area findability, and to pressure-test tags and filters
  • Analyzed content in existing Case Study pages and checked for redundancy and relevance
  • Established requirements for the Case Study template and writing guidelines
  • Went through the template creation process with stakeholders
  • Collaborated on the design, development, and high-level usability testing of the filter and sorting components (showing designs); used Google Analytics and Crazy Egg heatmaps after release, including A/B testing of selector placement
  • Checked accessibility of the Case Study Selector: keyboard reach for filters and sorting, focus order, and labels so the catalog stayed usable beyond mouse-only browsing
  • Released the new component and included it on multiple product pages

Learnings

From this project I got three main takeaways:

  1. A great product is the one that can start a culture adjustment in an organization. Before the Case Study Selector, content about existing projects sat on the sidelines and was overshadowed by new products and services. After Case Studies became easier to understand, find, and update, they gained real meaning.
  2. Working across siloed departments can become endless if you do not watch the clock. It is important to set expectations and deadlines to avoid the project from extending itself.
Next Case Study: Knowledge-base
Low on time? FAQ