The tradeoff we shipped

Sending the model less of the case made its answers worth more

Context sent to the model

Task-relevant evidence onlyWhole case + extra docs

Relevance and explainability 
Latency and cost 
Hallucination risk 

“Do the inflows support the stated source of wealth?”

row 124.2 BTC from an attributed exchange.

documentsNo sale agreement, so the 2023 sale is uncorroborated here.

row 124.2 BTC from an attributed exchange.

Similar patterns appear across the wider case file, which may indicate a legitimate disposal.

The profile looks consistent with a company sale. Inflows, counterparties and timing all agree.

Fluent, wide-ranging, unsourced. Nothing traces back to a row.

We chose a narrower, task-relevant context over broader scope, trading comprehensiveness for explainability.